Acquisition of F-44 Turbine fuel, Aviation

Kort beskrivelse

The Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization (DALO) wishes to enter into a Framework Agreement with one supplier regarding delivery of high flash point aviation turbine fuel of specification MIL-DTL-5624W, Grade JP-5 (F-44). F-44 is for use for ship-based helicopters.

F-44 shall be delivered on DALOs Naval stations in Frederikshavn and Korsør and on Bornholm, Greenland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands. In the North Atlantic the primary ports will be Nuuk, Rykjavik, and Thorshavn, but other Locations may become relevant furthermore worldwide deliveries will be desirable.

The supplier shall establish stockreserves on 100.000 liters in Denmark, exclusive stock on Bornholm and stockreserves on 50.000 liters in Greenland, Iceland, Faroe Islands and Bornholm.

In North Atlantic and Bornholm, the supplier shall establish stock facilities and electronic equipped fuelstations with filtersystems according to EI/JIG Standard 1530 or equivalent. The supplier shall also be able to establish similar stock reserves worldwide if needed.

The fuel must be delivered to a container or be pump directly into the ship at delivery.

The yearly consumption during the Framework Agreement is expected to be 250.000 liter delivered in Denmark and 400.000 liter delivered in the North Atlantic. DALO are not able to estimate the consumption worldwide because it will depend on operational requirements, the evaluation will be based on 100.000 liter in average pr. year.

The average delivery will be 30.000 liters but the deliveries will vary in the range from 5.000 liter to 70.000 liter.

Yderligere oplysninger

The mandatory exclusion grounds set out in sections 134a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement Act apply for this procurement.

The exclusion ground in section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act is a specific national exclusion ground. The provision stipulates that the contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and has not acceded to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements committing Denmark to open the public procurement market to tenderers established in that country. However, for reasons of overriding public interest, the contracting entity may refrain from excluding a candidate or tenderer that is subject to the ground for exclusion.

It is stressed, however, that the voluntary grounds for exclusion in section 137 of the Danish Public Procurement Act do not apply for this procurement, irrespective of whether the text in "Participation, Exclusion grouds" (which is system-generated) may suggest this.

No particular legal form is required. If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent the group.

The agreement is not divided into lots since a division of the agreement will undermine the economies of scale obtainable by one agreement.

As part of its offer, the tenderer must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Please note that a tenderer may rely on the capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subcontractor), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the tenderer and the entity or entities on which the tenderer relies. In this case, the tenderer must ensure that an ESPD from the entity or entities on which the tenderer relies is submitted along with the tenderer’s own ESPD. The ESPD of the entity or entities in question must include equivalent information.

A tenderer may only submit one offer.

The tenderer and, if relevant, the participants in the group of entities and/or entities on which the tenderer relies, must use the ESPD, see section 148 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, as preliminary evidence that the participants are not subject to any of the exclusion grounds set out in sections 134a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, and that the tenderer fulfils the suitability requirements.

It is not necessary for the tenderer to sign the ESPD document. If the tenderer is a group of entities (consortiums), the participants not submitting the offer must sign their ESPD document. Any entities relied on must also sign the ESPD.

It is pointed out that this procedure is subject to Article 5k of Regulation (EU) no. 833/2014, as amended. The provision contains a prohibition against award of contracts to Russian companies and Russian-controlled companies etc. (reference is made to Article 5k, section 1 for the exact delimitation of the operators that are subject to the prohibition). DALO reserves the right at any time during the tender process to require tenderers to prove that they are not subject to the prohibition, for example by requiring documentation regarding the tenderers’ and any subcontractors’ place of establishment and ownership.

If a tenderer relies on the capacity of other entities, see the section Selection criteria, the candidate shall upon request provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the candidate has access to the necessary economic and financial standing, and that the entity referred to has a legal obligation to the candidate. If such documentation is not provided, DALO cannot take into account the economic and financial standing of such entity or entities. DALO has prepared a template (available in the electronic tender system) to be used to confirm the legal obligation.

Regarding "Contract terms": As part of the submission of offer, the tenderer must submit a self-declaration on compliance with labour clauses, CSR obligations and international sanctions. In this connection, DALO reserves the right, at any time during the tender process, to let the tenderer rectify a missing or inadequately completed self-declaration.

DALO has uploaded a template (available in the electronic tender system) which must be used as declaration.

Where groups of entities (e.g. consortiums), including temporary joint ventures, participate jointly in the tender procedure, the self-declaration must be submitted separately for each of the participating entities.

DALO reserves the right – but is not obliged – to use the remedies provided for in section 159(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act if offers do not fulfil the requirements of the tender documents. It should be noted that irrespective of the wording of the requirements of the tender documents to the effect that information, declarations and documentation must be submitted, e.g. concerning a description of the deliverables put up for tender, DALO is not prevented from obtaining additional information, etc., pursuant to section 159(5), cf. section 159(6) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

An information meeting will be held on 10th January 2024 at 13:00 hrs local time prior to the deadline for submission of offer. Reference is made to the instructions to tenderers for further information in that regard.

Prior to decision on award of the agreement, DALO requires that the tenderer to whom DALO intends to award the agreement presents documentation for the information stated in the ESPD, see sections 151-155 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

DALO demands that the tenderer and each of the legal entities on whose economic and financial capacities the tenderer relies undertake joint and several liability for the performance of the agreement.

The estimated value of the framework agreement is DKK 90.000.000, and the maximum value of the agreement is DKK 270.000.000. The reason for the difference between the stated values is the uncertainty regarding the final value of the agreement, see below. Hence, the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the agreement at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes the maximum value of purchases under the agreement in its duration.

The uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement is primarily caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through the duration of the agreement, including in particular uncertainty about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for the entire span of the agreement. Thus, changes to the operational needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause a significantly larger expenditure under the agreement than what is expected at the moment.

Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier

For supply contracts: certificates by quality control institutes: Can the economic operator provide the required certificates drawn up by official quality control institutes or agencies of recognised competence attesting the conformity of products clearly identified by references to the technical specifications or standards, which are set out in the relevant notice or the procurement documents?

Betingelser for opfyldelse af kontrakten

The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements, international sanctions as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up actions; reference is made to the tender documents for further information. In the procurement of the agreement, the risk profile is assessed to the following follow-up action (risk level): B.

Beskrivelse af udelukkelsesgrunde

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.

Yderligere omfattede købere

The agreement is entered into by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Yderligere oplysninger

The mandatory exclusion grounds set out in sections 134a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement Act apply for this procurement.

The exclusion ground in section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act is a specific national exclusion ground. The provision stipulates that the contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and has not acceded to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements committing Denmark to open the public procurement market to tenderers established in that country. However, for reasons of overriding public interest, the contracting entity may refrain from excluding a candidate or tenderer that is subject to the ground for exclusion.

It is stressed, however, that the voluntary grounds for exclusion in section 137 of the Danish Public Procurement Act do not apply for this procurement, irrespective of whether the text in "Participation, Exclusion grouds" (which is system-generated) may suggest this.

No particular legal form is required. If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent the group.

The agreement is not divided into lots since a division of the agreement will undermine the economies of scale obtainable by one agreement.

As part of its offer, the tenderer must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Please note that a tenderer may rely on the capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subcontractor), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the tenderer and the entity or entities on which the tenderer relies. In this case, the tenderer must ensure that an ESPD from the entity or entities on which the tenderer relies is submitted along with the tenderer’s own ESPD. The ESPD of the entity or entities in question must include equivalent information.

A tenderer may only submit one offer.

The tenderer and, if relevant, the participants in the group of entities and/or entities on which the tenderer relies, must use the ESPD, see section 148 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, as preliminary evidence that the participants are not subject to any of the exclusion grounds set out in sections 134a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, and that the tenderer fulfils the suitability requirements.

It is not necessary for the tenderer to sign the ESPD document. If the tenderer is a group of entities (consortiums), the participants not submitting the offer must sign their ESPD document. Any entities relied on must also sign the ESPD.

It is pointed out that this procedure is subject to Article 5k of Regulation (EU) no. 833/2014, as amended. The provision contains a prohibition against award of contracts to Russian companies and Russian-controlled companies etc. (reference is made to Article 5k, section 1 for the exact delimitation of the operators that are subject to the prohibition). DALO reserves the right at any time during the tender process to require tenderers to prove that they are not subject to the prohibition, for example by requiring documentation regarding the tenderers’ and any subcontractors’ place of establishment and ownership.

If a tenderer relies on the capacity of other entities, see the section Selection criteria, the candidate shall upon request provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the candidate has access to the necessary economic and financial standing, and that the entity referred to has a legal obligation to the candidate. If such documentation is not provided, DALO cannot take into account the economic and financial standing of such entity or entities. DALO has prepared a template (available in the electronic tender system) to be used to confirm the legal obligation.

Regarding "Contract terms": As part of the submission of offer, the tenderer must submit a self-declaration on compliance with labour clauses, CSR obligations and international sanctions. In this connection, DALO reserves the right, at any time during the tender process, to let the tenderer rectify a missing or inadequately completed self-declaration.

DALO has uploaded a template (available in the electronic tender system) which must be used as declaration.

Where groups of entities (e.g. consortiums), including temporary joint ventures, participate jointly in the tender procedure, the self-declaration must be submitted separately for each of the participating entities.

DALO reserves the right – but is not obliged – to use the remedies provided for in section 159(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act if offers do not fulfil the requirements of the tender documents. It should be noted that irrespective of the wording of the requirements of the tender documents to the effect that information, declarations and documentation must be submitted, e.g. concerning a description of the deliverables put up for tender, DALO is not prevented from obtaining additional information, etc., pursuant to section 159(5), cf. section 159(6) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

An information meeting will be held on 10th January 2024 at 13:00 hrs local time prior to the deadline for submission of offer. Reference is made to the instructions to tenderers for further information in that regard.

Prior to decision on award of the agreement, DALO requires that the tenderer to whom DALO intends to award the agreement presents documentation for the information stated in the ESPD, see sections 151-155 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

DALO demands that the tenderer and each of the legal entities on whose economic and financial capacities the tenderer relies undertake joint and several liability for the performance of the agreement.

The estimated value of the framework agreement is DKK 90.000.000, and the maximum value of the agreement is DKK 270.000.000. The reason for the difference between the stated values is the uncertainty regarding the final value of the agreement, see below. Hence, the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the agreement at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes the maximum value of purchases under the agreement in its duration.

The uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement is primarily caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through the duration of the agreement, including in particular uncertainty about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for the entire span of the agreement. Thus, changes to the operational needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause a significantly larger expenditure under the agreement than what is expected at the moment.

Præcise oplysninger om fristerne for gennemgangsprocedurer

Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint apply:

1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2) Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3) Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).

The complainant must inform the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4) of the Act on The Complaints Board for Public Procurement. If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see section 12(1).

The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.