BOAT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING AND DIVING

Kort beskrivelse

The Danish Environmental Protection Agency intends to buy 1 pc. aluminium rigid hull boat, with a length of 6-7 meters, for environmental sampling and diving. The contract includesoptions for a trailer and a second boat of the same type.The precise requirements for the boat are specified in the tender material.

Yderligere oplysninger

The tenderer is obliged to comply with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance of the contract.
Pursuant to Consolidated Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016 on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement as amended, the following time limits apply to the filing of requests for a review procedure:
Complaints about procurement procedures or decisions falling within Part II of the Danish Public Procurement Act
which are not covered by subsection 1 of the Act, must, according to section 7(2) of the Act, be filed with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
(1) 45 calendar days of the contracting authority having published a notice in the Official Journal of the European
Union to the effect that the contracting authority has entered into a contract. The time limit is calculated from the
date after the date when the notice was published;
(2) 30 calendar days, calculated from the date after the date when the contracting authority notified the affected
tenderers that a contract based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing
system has been entered into, if the notification contained a statement of the reasons for the decision.
(3) six months of the contracting authority having entered into a framework agreement, counted from the date after
the date when the contracting authority notified the affected candidates and tenderers, see section 2(2) of the Act, or
section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
(4) 20 calendar days calculated from the date after the contracting authority has announced its decision, see section 185(2), second sentence, of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
If a contracting authority has complied with the procedure outlined in section 4 of the Act to ensure that a contract is not declared ineffective, see section 7(3) of the Act, an application for a review of whether the contracting authority has entered into a contract in contravention of the Public Procurement Directive without prior publication
4
This document is based on the template from the Advisory Department – Government Procurement
of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union must be filed with the Danish Complaints Board
for Public Procurement within 30 calendar days calculated from the date after the date when the contracting
authority has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that the contracting authority
has entered into a contract, provided that the notice contains the reasons for the contracting authority’s decision to
award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Not later than on the date of the filing of an application for a review procedure with the Danish Complaints Board
for Public Procurement, the applicant must notify the contracting authority in writing that an application for a
review procedure has been filed with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement, see section 6(4) of the
Act. Furthermore, the contracting authority must be informed of whether the application for a review procedure has
been filed in the stand-still period, see section 3(1) or (2) of the Act, or during the period of 10 calendar days laid
down in section 4(1)(ii). In cases where the application for a review procedure has not been filed in the above mentioned periods, the applicant must also state whether the applicant has applied for a stay pending the outcome
of the review procedure, see section 12(1) of the Act.
The Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own review procedure guidelines are available on
www.klfu.dk.
The tendered contract has not been divided into lots, see section 49(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, for the sake of securing functionality for the supplied solution in its intirety, and for the sake of having a single point supplier in case of defects and warranty-related issues.
The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance with the requirements set out
in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the contract, documentation of the information provided in the ESPD must be
submitted, see sections 151 and 152 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
5
This document is based on the template from the Advisory Department – Government Procurement
By way of documentation that a tenderer does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in
section 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii), the following must be provided in accordance with section 153 of the
Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not encompassed
by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not fall within section 135(3) and section
137(1)(ii);
- where the country in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the cases
specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii), they may be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in
countries where there is no provision for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a
competent judicial authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or
more members of a group or other entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation, if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a. For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above, the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does not have the
possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned
tenderer that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an appropriate time limit
provided sufficient documentation of its reliability (self-cleaning), or if the provided documentation is not
considered sufficient to document reliability. For information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

The contracting authority shall also exclude economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.

Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier

For så vidt angår vareindkøbskontrakter: certifikater udstedt af kvalitetskontrolinstitutter: Kan den økonomiske aktør levere de krævede certifikater udstedt af officielle kvalitetskontrolinstitutter eller -agenturer, hvis kompetence er anerkendt, og som attesterer, at varer, der er klart identificeret ved henvisning til tekniske specifikationer eller standarder, som er fastsat i den relevante meddelelse eller i udbudsdokumenterne, er i overensstemmelse med disse?

Yderligere oplysninger

The tenderer is obliged to comply with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance of the contract.
Pursuant to Consolidated Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016 on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement as amended, the following time limits apply to the filing of requests for a review procedure:
Complaints about procurement procedures or decisions falling within Part II of the Danish Public Procurement Act
which are not covered by subsection 1 of the Act, must, according to section 7(2) of the Act, be filed with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
(1) 45 calendar days of the contracting authority having published a notice in the Official Journal of the European
Union to the effect that the contracting authority has entered into a contract. The time limit is calculated from the
date after the date when the notice was published;
(2) 30 calendar days, calculated from the date after the date when the contracting authority notified the affected
tenderers that a contract based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing
system has been entered into, if the notification contained a statement of the reasons for the decision.
(3) six months of the contracting authority having entered into a framework agreement, counted from the date after
the date when the contracting authority notified the affected candidates and tenderers, see section 2(2) of the Act, or
section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
(4) 20 calendar days calculated from the date after the contracting authority has announced its decision, see section 185(2), second sentence, of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
If a contracting authority has complied with the procedure outlined in section 4 of the Act to ensure that a contract is not declared ineffective, see section 7(3) of the Act, an application for a review of whether the contracting authority has entered into a contract in contravention of the Public Procurement Directive without prior publication
4
This document is based on the template from the Advisory Department – Government Procurement
of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union must be filed with the Danish Complaints Board
for Public Procurement within 30 calendar days calculated from the date after the date when the contracting
authority has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that the contracting authority
has entered into a contract, provided that the notice contains the reasons for the contracting authority’s decision to
award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Not later than on the date of the filing of an application for a review procedure with the Danish Complaints Board
for Public Procurement, the applicant must notify the contracting authority in writing that an application for a
review procedure has been filed with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement, see section 6(4) of the
Act. Furthermore, the contracting authority must be informed of whether the application for a review procedure has
been filed in the stand-still period, see section 3(1) or (2) of the Act, or during the period of 10 calendar days laid
down in section 4(1)(ii). In cases where the application for a review procedure has not been filed in the above mentioned periods, the applicant must also state whether the applicant has applied for a stay pending the outcome
of the review procedure, see section 12(1) of the Act.
The Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own review procedure guidelines are available on
www.klfu.dk.
The tendered contract has not been divided into lots, see section 49(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, for the sake of securing functionality for the supplied solution in its intirety, and for the sake of having a single point supplier in case of defects and warranty-related issues.
The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance with the requirements set out
in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the contract, documentation of the information provided in the ESPD must be
submitted, see sections 151 and 152 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
5
This document is based on the template from the Advisory Department – Government Procurement
By way of documentation that a tenderer does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in
section 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii), the following must be provided in accordance with section 153 of the
Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not encompassed
by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not fall within section 135(3) and section
137(1)(ii);
- where the country in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the cases
specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii), they may be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in
countries where there is no provision for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a
competent judicial authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or
more members of a group or other entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation, if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a. For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above, the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does not have the
possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned
tenderer that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an appropriate time limit
provided sufficient documentation of its reliability (self-cleaning), or if the provided documentation is not
considered sufficient to document reliability. For information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

The contracting authority shall also exclude economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.

Præcise oplysninger om fristerne for gennemgangsprocedurer

I henhold til LBK nr. 593 af 2.6.2016 om Klagenævnet for Udbud med senere ændringer, gælder følgende frister for indgivelse af klage:

Klage over udbud eller beslutninger omfattet af udbudslovens afsnit II, som ikke er omfattet af lovens stk. 1, skal, jf. lovens § 7, stk. 2, være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

45 kalenderdage efter at ordregiveren har offentliggjort en bekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende om, at ordregiveren har indgået en kontrakt. Fristen regnes fra dagen efter den dag, hvor bekendtgørelsen er blevet offentliggjort;

30 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte tilbudsgivere om, at en kontrakt baseret på en rammeaftale med genåbning af konkurrencen eller et dynamisk indkøbssystem er indgået, hvis underretningen har angivet en begrundelse for beslutningen;

6 måneder efter at ordregiveren har indgået en rammeaftale regnet fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte ansøgere og tilbudsgivere, jf. § 2, stk. 2, eller udbudslovens § 171, stk. 4;

20 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen efter at ordregiveren har meddelt sin beslutning, jf. udbudslovens § 185, stk. 2, 2. pkt.

Har en ordregiver fulgt proceduren i lovens § 4, for at sikre, at en kontrakt ikke erklæres for uden virkning, jf. lovens § 7, stk. 3, skal en klage over, at ordregiveren i strid med udbudsdirektivet har indgået en kontrakt uden forudgående offentliggørelse af en udbudsbekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende, være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden 30 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har offentliggjort en bekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende om, at ordregiveren har indgået en kontrakt, forudsat at bekendtgørelsen indeholder begrundelsen for ordregiverens beslutning om at tildele kontrakten uden forudgående offentliggørelse af en udbudsbekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.

Senest samtidig med at en klage indgives til Klagenævnet for Udbud, skal klageren, jf. lovens § 6, stk. 4, skriftligt underrette ordregiveren om, at klage indgives til Klagenævnet for Udbud, og om, hvorvidt klagen er indgivet i standstill-perioden, jf. § 3, stk. 1 eller 2, eller i den periode på 10 kalenderdage, som er fastsat i § 4, stk. 1, nr. 2. I tilfælde, hvor klagen ikke er indgivet i de nævnte perioder, skal klageren tillige angive, hvorvidt der begæres opsættende virkning, jf. lovens § 12, stk. 1.