It is the intention to carry out an evaluation which investigates whether and how management principles and practice as it has evolved, supports the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation, in light of the changes in Danish development cooperation. The evaluation will be mainly forward looking and focus on learning. The evaluation has three objectives: (1) To assess whether and how changes in development cooperation since 2009 have been addressed by aid management in a relevant and appropriate manner, in line with the intentions behind the decentralisation. (2) To assess whether and how the changes since 2018-19 in management are conducive to fostering conditions for achieving the intentions embedded in the DDD and adaptive management approach. (3) To provide lessons learned regarding strengths and weaknesses in management of Danish development cooperation as well as enabling and hindering factors, and to present issues for consideration, including identification of dilemmas or trade-offs, and recommendations on adjustments as relevant. In order to achieve these objectives, it will be needed to establish a descriptive overview of the main developments in management of Danish development cooperation since the last evaluation in 2009. The description will comprise both developments in Danish development support, including its size, instruments, and composition, and developments in policies and principles that have guided the management of Danish development cooperation, as well as the broader donor landscape/aid architecture and international development agenda. In this evaluation, management will be used to describe MFA management of support to development cooperation. This includes the management of both bilateral and multilateral development support at headquarter level in Copenhagen and at embassies/missions. This implies that programmes implemented by other ministries and institutions but managed in Copenhagen will be covered by the evaluation (e.g. Strategic Sector Cooperation (SSC)). Here, focus will be on MFA’s role and management in relation to such activities, not on the management by other actors. Development-related activities in Denmark, such as in-donor refugee costs, will be excluded from the evaluation, as will development support channelled through the EU. Aid management guidelines is a key set of documents, that sets out the formal requirements for the management of development cooperation. It will not be a purpose in the evaluation to assess the implementation of the various development cooperation activities per se or the results hereof. Focus will be on the management of development cooperation, and how well it underpins the development support. Thus, it must be noted that the management system is not solely responsible for whether the development cooperation fulfils the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation policy, and the evaluation must therefore address the management system as an important, but not the only, element that shapes Danish development cooperation practice, and consider the interplay between the management system, requirements, processes etc., and the aid portfolio, organizational set up and other relevant factors. Please refer to the Consultancy Agreement, Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for a more detailed description of the object of the procurement.
Deadline
Fristen for modtagelse af bud var på 2023-12-12.
Indkøbet blev offentliggjort på 2023-11-23.
Udbudsbekendtgørelse (2023-11-23) Objekt Omfanget af udbuddet
Titel: Evaluation of Management of Danish Development Cooperation 20 years after decentralisation
Referencenummer: 23/18749
Kort beskrivelse:
It is the intention to carry out an evaluation which investigates whether and how management principles and practice as it has evolved, supports the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation, in light of the changes in Danish development cooperation.
The evaluation will be mainly forward looking and focus on learning. The evaluation has three objectives:
(1) To assess whether and how changes in development cooperation since 2009 have been addressed by aid management in a relevant and appropriate manner, in line with the intentions behind the decentralisation.
(2) To assess whether and how the changes since 2018-19 in management are conducive to fostering conditions for achieving the intentions embedded in the DDD and adaptive management approach.
(3) To provide lessons learned regarding strengths and weaknesses in management of Danish development cooperation as well as enabling and hindering factors, and to present issues for consideration, including identification of dilemmas or trade-offs, and recommendations on adjustments as relevant.
In order to achieve these objectives, it will be needed to establish a descriptive overview of the main developments in management of Danish development cooperation since the last evaluation in 2009. The description will comprise both developments in Danish development support, including its size, instruments, and composition, and developments in policies and principles that have guided the management of Danish development cooperation, as well as the broader donor landscape/aid architecture and international development agenda.
In this evaluation, management will be used to describe MFA management of support to development cooperation. This includes the management of both bilateral and multilateral development support at headquarter level in Copenhagen and at embassies/missions. This implies that programmes implemented by other ministries and institutions but managed in Copenhagen will be covered by the evaluation (e.g. Strategic Sector Cooperation (SSC)). Here, focus will be on MFA’s role and management in relation to such activities, not on the management by other actors. Development-related activities in Denmark, such as in-donor refugee costs, will be excluded from the evaluation, as will development support channelled through the EU. Aid management guidelines is a key set of documents, that sets out the formal requirements for the management of development cooperation.
It will not be a purpose in the evaluation to assess the implementation of the various development cooperation activities per se or the results hereof. Focus will be on the management of development cooperation, and how well it underpins the development support. Thus, it must be noted that the management system is not solely responsible for whether the development cooperation fulfils the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation policy, and the evaluation must therefore address the management system as an important, but not the only, element that shapes Danish development cooperation practice, and consider the interplay between the management system, requirements, processes etc., and the aid portfolio, organizational set up and other relevant factors.
Please refer to the Consultancy Agreement, Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for a more detailed description of the object of the procurement.
It is the intention to carry out an evaluation which investigates whether and how management principles and practice as it has evolved, supports the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation, in light of the changes in Danish development cooperation.
The evaluation will be mainly forward looking and focus on learning. The evaluation has three objectives:
(1) To assess whether and how changes in development cooperation since 2009 have been addressed by aid management in a relevant and appropriate manner, in line with the intentions behind the decentralisation.
(2) To assess whether and how the changes since 2018-19 in management are conducive to fostering conditions for achieving the intentions embedded in the DDD and adaptive management approach.
(3) To provide lessons learned regarding strengths and weaknesses in management of Danish development cooperation as well as enabling and hindering factors, and to present issues for consideration, including identification of dilemmas or trade-offs, and recommendations on adjustments as relevant.
In order to achieve these objectives, it will be needed to establish a descriptive overview of the main developments in management of Danish development cooperation since the last evaluation in 2009. The description will comprise both developments in Danish development support, including its size, instruments, and composition, and developments in policies and principles that have guided the management of Danish development cooperation, as well as the broader donor landscape/aid architecture and international development agenda.
In this evaluation, management will be used to describe MFA management of support to development cooperation. This includes the management of both bilateral and multilateral development support at headquarter level in Copenhagen and at embassies/missions. This implies that programmes implemented by other ministries and institutions but managed in Copenhagen will be covered by the evaluation (e.g. Strategic Sector Cooperation (SSC)). Here, focus will be on MFA’s role and management in relation to such activities, not on the management by other actors. Development-related activities in Denmark, such as in-donor refugee costs, will be excluded from the evaluation, as will development support channelled through the EU. Aid management guidelines is a key set of documents, that sets out the formal requirements for the management of development cooperation.
It will not be a purpose in the evaluation to assess the implementation of the various development cooperation activities per se or the results hereof. Focus will be on the management of development cooperation, and how well it underpins the development support. Thus, it must be noted that the management system is not solely responsible for whether the development cooperation fulfils the aims and ambitions of Danish development cooperation policy, and the evaluation must therefore address the management system as an important, but not the only, element that shapes Danish development cooperation practice, and consider the interplay between the management system, requirements, processes etc., and the aid portfolio, organizational set up and other relevant factors.
Please refer to the Consultancy Agreement, Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for a more detailed description of the object of the procurement.
Kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser
Produkter/tjenester: Evalueringsrådgivningstjenester📦
Anslået værdi uden moms: 4 500 000 DKK 💰
Beskrivelse
Intern ID: 23/18749
Yderligere oplysninger:
In Part III.A-C of the ESPD, economic operators must answer whether they are subject to exclusion grounds.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein has been convicted by final judgement or fined within the last 5 years for any of the exclusion grounds relating to the criminal convictions listed in section 135(1) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities in relation to payment of taxes and payment of social security, cf. section 135(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. An economic operator is, however, not excluded where the economic operator has agreed on a repayment scheme with the collection authority and that scheme is observed, cf. section 135(4), or where the economic operator provides guarantee of payment of the part of the debt which constitutes DKK 100,000 or more, cf. section 135(5).
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it is subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(1) and 136(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it within the last 3 years has been subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(3-4) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is not required to answer whether it is subject to purely national exclusion grounds, cf. Part III.D of the ESPD.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator is established in a country which is entered on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and which has not adopted the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open its market for public contracts for tenderers established in the country in question, cf. section 134 a of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority can accept the following documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act (in order of priority):
(1) Extracts from the relevant register or similar documents issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority or certificates issued by the competent authority in the country referred to as documentation that the tenderer is not subject to the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2);
(2) A declaration on oath (only if such extracts, certificates or similar documents are not issued in the country where the economic operator is established, or where the documentation does not cover all the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) entirely);
(3) A solemn declaration made by the person concerned before a competent judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a competent professional or trade body, in the country of origin or in the country where the economic operator is established (only if there is no provision for declarations on oath in the country where the economic operator is established).
Thus, the contracting authority cannot accept e.g. a solemn declaration made before a notary if there can be issued a certificate by the competent authority in the country where the economic operator is established. Moreover, the contracting authority cannot accept self-declarations or similar declarations issued by the economic operator or the person concerned as documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds.
Economic operators can identify the relevant documentation using the online platform e-Certis: https://ec.europa.eu/tools/ecertis
Economic operators are encouraged to submit all necessary documentation in the tender.
In Part III.A-C of the ESPD, economic operators must answer whether they are subject to exclusion grounds.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein has been convicted by final judgement or fined within the last 5 years for any of the exclusion grounds relating to the criminal convictions listed in section 135(1) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities in relation to payment of taxes and payment of social security, cf. section 135(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. An economic operator is, however, not excluded where the economic operator has agreed on a repayment scheme with the collection authority and that scheme is observed, cf. section 135(4), or where the economic operator provides guarantee of payment of the part of the debt which constitutes DKK 100,000 or more, cf. section 135(5).
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it is subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(1) and 136(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it within the last 3 years has been subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(3-4) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is not required to answer whether it is subject to purely national exclusion grounds, cf. Part III.D of the ESPD.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator is established in a country which is entered on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and which has not adopted the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open its market for public contracts for tenderers established in the country in question, cf. section 134 a of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority can accept the following documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act (in order of priority):
(1) Extracts from the relevant register or similar documents issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority or certificates issued by the competent authority in the country referred to as documentation that the tenderer is not subject to the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2);
(2) A declaration on oath (only if such extracts, certificates or similar documents are not issued in the country where the economic operator is established, or where the documentation does not cover all the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) entirely);
(3) A solemn declaration made by the person concerned before a competent judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a competent professional or trade body, in the country of origin or in the country where the economic operator is established (only if there is no provision for declarations on oath in the country where the economic operator is established).
Thus, the contracting authority cannot accept e.g. a solemn declaration made before a notary if there can be issued a certificate by the competent authority in the country where the economic operator is established. Moreover, the contracting authority cannot accept self-declarations or similar declarations issued by the economic operator or the person concerned as documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds.
Economic operators can identify the relevant documentation using the online platform e-Certis: https://ec.europa.eu/tools/ecertis
Economic operators are encouraged to submit all necessary documentation in the tender.
The evaluation will require meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark in Copenhagen.
Land:
Etiopien 🇪🇹
Niger 🇳🇪
Uganda 🇺🇬
+ 2 mere
Vietnam 🇻🇳
USA 🇺🇸
Sted for udførelsen: Byen København
🏙️ Varighed
Startdato: 2024-01-01 📅
Slutdato: 2024-11-30 📅
Kriterier for tildeling
Pris ✅
Pris (justeringskoefficient): 20
Kvalitetskriterium (navn): Adequacy of Methodology and Work Plan
Kvalitetskriterium (vægtning): 32
Kvalitetskriterium (navn): Qualifications and Competence of Key Staff
Kvalitetskriterium (vægtning): 48
Titel
Partiets identifikationsnummer: LOT-0000
Procedure Type af procedure
Åben procedure ✅
Retsgrundlag: Direktiv 2014/24/EU
Hovedpunkterne i proceduren:
The procurement procedure is subject to the laws of Denmark and the rules applicable hereunder. Thus, the procedure is carried out in accordance with the Danish Public Procurement Act (Act no. 1564 of 15 December 2015). The official Danish version is available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/10
The procurement procedure is carried out as an open procedure. Thus, all economic operators may submit tenders in response to the contract notice published in the Official Journal of the EU.
Economic operators must submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) as preliminary evidence that the economic operator is not subject to exclusion grounds and that the economic operator fulfils the requirements for economic and financial standing and technical and professional ability.
When the economic operator is participating together with others or if the economic operator relies on the capacity of other entities, each participating economic operator must provide a separate ESPD.
In accordance with the Danida Evaluation Guidelines and the OECD DAC Quality Standards for Development Evaluation, the tenderer and each involved Key Staff must declare individually regarding engagement in other activities than the tendered evaluation assignment. Decisions on whether a conflict of interest or unfair competition exists rest with the contracting authority and are made on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, the tenderer must submit declarations of prior and ongoing involvement from the tenderer (Appendix 10A) and each involved Key Staff (Appendix 10B).
The contracting authority has a maximum budget of DKK 4,500,000.00 net of VAT in relation to the procurement. Tenders will be rejected if they exceed the contracting authority's maximum budget.
In the tender, economic operators must submit a completed and signed statement regarding Article 5k(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023. The contract cannot be awarded to a tenderer subject to Article 5k(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023.
This contract has not been divided into lots due to necessary coordination and market and economic considerations.
Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their participation in the procedure.
The procurement procedure is subject to the laws of Denmark and the rules applicable hereunder. Thus, the procedure is carried out in accordance with the Danish Public Procurement Act (Act no. 1564 of 15 December 2015). The official Danish version is available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/10
The procurement procedure is carried out as an open procedure. Thus, all economic operators may submit tenders in response to the contract notice published in the Official Journal of the EU.
Economic operators must submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) as preliminary evidence that the economic operator is not subject to exclusion grounds and that the economic operator fulfils the requirements for economic and financial standing and technical and professional ability.
When the economic operator is participating together with others or if the economic operator relies on the capacity of other entities, each participating economic operator must provide a separate ESPD.
In accordance with the Danida Evaluation Guidelines and the OECD DAC Quality Standards for Development Evaluation, the tenderer and each involved Key Staff must declare individually regarding engagement in other activities than the tendered evaluation assignment. Decisions on whether a conflict of interest or unfair competition exists rest with the contracting authority and are made on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, the tenderer must submit declarations of prior and ongoing involvement from the tenderer (Appendix 10A) and each involved Key Staff (Appendix 10B).
The contracting authority has a maximum budget of DKK 4,500,000.00 net of VAT in relation to the procurement. Tenders will be rejected if they exceed the contracting authority's maximum budget.
In the tender, economic operators must submit a completed and signed statement regarding Article 5k(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023. The contract cannot be awarded to a tenderer subject to Article 5k(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023.
This contract has not been divided into lots due to necessary coordination and market and economic considerations.
Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their participation in the procedure.
Fremskyndet procedure:
As the contract must be concluded in 2023, the contracting authority will not be able to conduct a procurement procedure in accordance with the minimum time limit of 30 days for submission of tenders. Therefore, the contracting authority will conduct an accelerated procedure in accordance with section 57(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The time limit has been set in accordance with section 57(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act as the contracting authority has provided more than the minimum 15 days to submit tenders, and the contracting authority cannot provide more time for the submission of tenders when the contracting authority will need to evaluate tenders, notify of the award decision, and conclude the contract in 2023.
As the contract must be concluded in 2023, the contracting authority will not be able to conduct a procurement procedure in accordance with the minimum time limit of 30 days for submission of tenders. Therefore, the contracting authority will conduct an accelerated procedure in accordance with section 57(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The time limit has been set in accordance with section 57(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act as the contracting authority has provided more than the minimum 15 days to submit tenders, and the contracting authority cannot provide more time for the submission of tenders when the contracting authority will need to evaluate tenders, notify of the award decision, and conclude the contract in 2023.
Administrative oplysninger
Frist for modtagelse af bud eller ansøgninger om deltagelse: 2023-12-12 14:00:00 📅
Betingelser for åbning af buddene: 2023-12-12 14:00:00 📅
Betingelser for åbning af tilbud (Oplysninger om bemyndigede personer og åbningsprocedure):
Tenders will be opened after the time limit for receipt of tenders.
Tenderers will not be entitled to attend the opening of tenders.
Sprog, på hvilke bud eller ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives: engelsk 🗣️
Minimumsfrist, inden for hvilken tilbudsgiveren skal opretholde tilbuddet: 6 måneder Udbudsbetingelser
Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud
Avanceret eller kvalificeret elektronisk signatur eller segl (jf forordning (EU) nr 910/2014) er påkrævet
Navnene på og de faglige kvalifikationer for det personale, der skal udføre kontrakten, skal angives
Åbningsdato: 2023-12-12 14:00:00 📅
Yderligere oplysninger:
Tenders will be opened after the time limit for receipt of tenders.
Tenderers will not be entitled to attend the opening of tenders.
Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet
Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling ✅ Kriterier for tildeling
Vægtningstype: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Udbudsbetingelser
Kontrakten indeholder gennemførelsesbetingelser ✅
Juridiske, økonomiske, finansielle og tekniske oplysninger Økonomisk og finansiel stilling
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier:
Average yearly turnover: In Part IV.B of the ESPD, the tenderer must fill in its average yearly turnover for the last 2 financial years available (where the tenderer can present annual reports).
The tenderer is required to have an average yearly turnover of minimum DKK 9,000,000.00 for the last 2 financial years available.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others (e.g. a consortia or joint venture) or if the economic operator relies on the economic and financial standing of other entities, the participating economic operators or the entities referred to are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
The contracting authority can accept annual reports or excerpts hereof or relevant statements from a bank or certified accountant as documentation in relation to the economic and financial standing.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others or when an economic operator relies on the economic and financial standing of other entities, the economic operator must also provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the economic operator has access to the necessary economic and financial standing. The statements of support must establish a legal obligation for the party concerned and state that the involved economic operators or entities are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier
Average yearly turnover: In Part IV.B of the ESPD, the tenderer must fill in its average yearly turnover for the last 2 financial years available (where the tenderer can present annual reports).
The tenderer is required to have an average yearly turnover of minimum DKK 9,000,000.00 for the last 2 financial years available.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others (e.g. a consortia or joint venture) or if the economic operator relies on the economic and financial standing of other entities, the participating economic operators or the entities referred to are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
The contracting authority can accept annual reports or excerpts hereof or relevant statements from a bank or certified accountant as documentation in relation to the economic and financial standing.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others or when an economic operator relies on the economic and financial standing of other entities, the economic operator must also provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the economic operator has access to the necessary economic and financial standing. The statements of support must establish a legal obligation for the party concerned and state that the involved economic operators or entities are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
Betingelser for deltagelse
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af regler og kriterier: Certificates by independent bodies about quality assurance standards
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af betingelserne: Enrolment in a relevant professional register
Teknisk og faglig kompetence
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier:
For service contracts: performance of services of the specified type: In Part IV.C of the ESPD, the tenderer must fill in a list of maximum 5 contracts entered into, ongoing or finalized within the last 3 years.
The number of performed contracts is determined based on all submitted ESPDs (i.e. from all involved economic operators in a group of economic operators and/or other supporting entities).
If a tenderer has listed more than 5 contracts, the contracting authority will only read and assess the 5 most recent contracts listed (first based on end date, and then based on start date).
Each listed contract should include the following information:
- A description of the contract (nature and quantity of services from the economic operator and how they compare to the description of this procurement),
- amount (remuneration received by the economic operator for the performance of the services),
- start date (date of conclusion of the contract),
- end date (date of completion of services), and
- recipient (name and contact information).
The tenderer is required to have performed (entered into, ongoing or finalized) minimum 1 contract regarding an independent evaluation of bilateral donor support that also includes issues related to management of development cooperation.
An ‘independent evaluation’ is an evaluation carried out for an evaluation unit of a development organisation.
A monitoring assignment (i.e. a long-term performance review of the implementation and results of a programme) will not be considered as a relevant reference.
An award of a framework agreement will not, in itself, be considered as a relevant reference, but a contract awarded under a framework agreement can be considered as a relevant reference if it fulfils the stipulated requirements.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others (e.g. a consortia or joint venture) or if the economic operator relies on the technical and professional abilities of other entities, the specific parts of the contract must be performed by the economic operators or entities with the required technical and professional abilities.
When an economic operator is formed by a group of economic operators or relies on the technical and professional abilities of other entities, the economic operator must also provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the economic operator has access to the necessary technical and professional abilities. The statements of support must establish a legal obligation for the party concerned and state the parts of the contract to be performed by the party concerned.
The contracting authority reserves the right to contact the recipients of services or require statements from the recipients, confirming that the economic operator has performed the listed contracts, as documentation in relation to the technical and professional ability.
Liste og kortfattet beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterier
For service contracts: performance of services of the specified type: In Part IV.C of the ESPD, the tenderer must fill in a list of maximum 5 contracts entered into, ongoing or finalized within the last 3 years.
The number of performed contracts is determined based on all submitted ESPDs (i.e. from all involved economic operators in a group of economic operators and/or other supporting entities).
If a tenderer has listed more than 5 contracts, the contracting authority will only read and assess the 5 most recent contracts listed (first based on end date, and then based on start date).
Each listed contract should include the following information:
- A description of the contract (nature and quantity of services from the economic operator and how they compare to the description of this procurement),
- amount (remuneration received by the economic operator for the performance of the services),
- start date (date of conclusion of the contract),
- end date (date of completion of services), and
- recipient (name and contact information).
The tenderer is required to have performed (entered into, ongoing or finalized) minimum 1 contract regarding an independent evaluation of bilateral donor support that also includes issues related to management of development cooperation.
An ‘independent evaluation’ is an evaluation carried out for an evaluation unit of a development organisation.
A monitoring assignment (i.e. a long-term performance review of the implementation and results of a programme) will not be considered as a relevant reference.
An award of a framework agreement will not, in itself, be considered as a relevant reference, but a contract awarded under a framework agreement can be considered as a relevant reference if it fulfils the stipulated requirements.
When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others (e.g. a consortia or joint venture) or if the economic operator relies on the technical and professional abilities of other entities, the specific parts of the contract must be performed by the economic operators or entities with the required technical and professional abilities.
When an economic operator is formed by a group of economic operators or relies on the technical and professional abilities of other entities, the economic operator must also provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the economic operator has access to the necessary technical and professional abilities. The statements of support must establish a legal obligation for the party concerned and state the parts of the contract to be performed by the party concerned.
The contracting authority reserves the right to contact the recipients of services or require statements from the recipients, confirming that the economic operator has performed the listed contracts, as documentation in relation to the technical and professional ability.
Betingelser i forbindelse med kontrakten
Betingelser for opfyldelse af kontrakten:
Prior to the signing of the contract, the tenderer, which the contracting authority has awarded the contract to, must present statements of availability from all non-permanent staff (e.g. project specific consultants or freelance consultants).
The winning tenderer is to perform the contract in compliance with the Danida Anti-Corruption Policy and the principles of the UN Global Compact. Tenderers can find more information on:
https://um.dk/en/danida/anti-corruptionhttps://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles
The contract includes a labour clause concerning conditions on pay and work for the staff assigned for the performance of the contract.
Prior to the signing of the contract, the tenderer, which the contracting authority has awarded the contract to, must present statements of availability from all non-permanent staff (e.g. project specific consultants or freelance consultants).
The winning tenderer is to perform the contract in compliance with the Danida Anti-Corruption Policy and the principles of the UN Global Compact. Tenderers can find more information on:
https://um.dk/en/danida/anti-corruption https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles
The contract includes a labour clause concerning conditions on pay and work for the staff assigned for the performance of the contract.
Betingelser for deltagelse
Udelukkelsesgrund:
Aktiver, der administreres af en kurator
Betaling af skatter og afgifter
Betaling af socialsikringsbidrag
+ 15 mere
Børnearbejde og andre former for menneskehandel
Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation
Direkte eller indirekte involvering i forberedelsen af denne udbudsprocedure
En situation, der svarer til konkurs i henhold til national ret
Erhvervsvirksomheden er indstillet
Har afgivet urigtige oplysninger eller tilbageholdt oplysninger, som ikke var i stand til at fremlægge de krævede dokumenter og indhentet fortrolige oplysninger i forbindelse med denne procedure
Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme
Insolvens
Interessekonflikt som følge af deltagelse i udbudsproceduren
Konkurs
Korruption
Skyldig i alvorlige forsømmelser i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet
Svig
Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet
Tvangsakkord uden for konkurs
Beskrivelse af udelukkelsesgrunde:
Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator.
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator.
Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for…
… participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).
… money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).
… fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).
… child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Can the economic operator confirm that:
a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,
b) It has withheld such information,
c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and
d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?
Can the economic operator confirm that:
a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,
b) It has withheld such information,
c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and
d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?
Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?
Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?
Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.
In Part III.A-C of the ESPD, economic operators must answer whether they are subject to exclusion grounds.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein has been convicted by final judgement or fined within the last 5 years for any of the exclusion grounds relating to the criminal convictions listed in section 135(1) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities in relation to payment of taxes and payment of social security, cf. section 135(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. An economic operator is, however, not excluded where the economic operator has agreed on a repayment scheme with the collection authority and that scheme is observed, cf. section 135(4), or where the economic operator provides guarantee of payment of the part of the debt which constitutes DKK 100,000 or more, cf. section 135(5).
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it is subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(1) and 136(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it within the last 3 years has been subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(3-4) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is not required to answer whether it is subject to purely national exclusion grounds, cf. Part III.D of the ESPD.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator is established in a country which is entered on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and which has not adopted the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open its market for public contracts for tenderers established in the country in question, cf. section 134 a of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority can accept the following documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act (in order of priority):
(1) Extracts from the relevant register or similar documents issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority or certificates issued by the competent authority in the country referred to as documentation that the tenderer is not subject to the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2);
(2) A declaration on oath (only if such extracts, certificates or similar documents are not issued in the country where the economic operator is established, or where the documentation does not cover all the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) entirely);
(3) A solemn declaration made by the person concerned before a competent judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a competent professional or trade body, in the country of origin or in the country where the economic operator is established (only if there is no provision for declarations on oath in the country where the economic operator is established).
Thus, the contracting authority cannot accept e.g. a solemn declaration made before a notary if there can be issued a certificate by the competent authority in the country where the economic operator is established. Moreover, the contracting authority cannot accept self-declarations or similar declarations issued by the economic operator or the person concerned as documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds.
Economic operators can identify the relevant documentation using the online platform e-Certis: https://ec.europa.eu/tools/ecertis
Economic operators are encouraged to submit all necessary documentation in the tender.
In Part III.A-C of the ESPD, economic operators must answer whether they are subject to exclusion grounds.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein has been convicted by final judgement or fined within the last 5 years for any of the exclusion grounds relating to the criminal convictions listed in section 135(1) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities in relation to payment of taxes and payment of social security, cf. section 135(3) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. An economic operator is, however, not excluded where the economic operator has agreed on a repayment scheme with the collection authority and that scheme is observed, cf. section 135(4), or where the economic operator provides guarantee of payment of the part of the debt which constitutes DKK 100,000 or more, cf. section 135(5).
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it is subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(1) and 136(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if it within the last 3 years has been subject to any of the exclusion grounds listed in sections 136(1)(3-4) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
An economic operator is not required to answer whether it is subject to purely national exclusion grounds, cf. Part III.D of the ESPD.
An economic operator is excluded from the procurement procedure if the economic operator is established in a country which is entered on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes and which has not adopted the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open its market for public contracts for tenderers established in the country in question, cf. section 134 a of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority can accept the following documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act (in order of priority):
(1) Extracts from the relevant register or similar documents issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority or certificates issued by the competent authority in the country referred to as documentation that the tenderer is not subject to the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2);
(2) A declaration on oath (only if such extracts, certificates or similar documents are not issued in the country where the economic operator is established, or where the documentation does not cover all the grounds for exclusion stipulated in sections 135(1), 135(3) and 137(1)(2) entirely);
(3) A solemn declaration made by the person concerned before a competent judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a competent professional or trade body, in the country of origin or in the country where the economic operator is established (only if there is no provision for declarations on oath in the country where the economic operator is established).
Thus, the contracting authority cannot accept e.g. a solemn declaration made before a notary if there can be issued a certificate by the competent authority in the country where the economic operator is established. Moreover, the contracting authority cannot accept self-declarations or similar declarations issued by the economic operator or the person concerned as documentation in relation to the exclusion grounds.
Economic operators can identify the relevant documentation using the online platform e-Certis: https://ec.europa.eu/tools/ecertis
Economic operators are encouraged to submit all necessary documentation in the tender.
Actions regarding the procedure (e.g. decisions regarding award of contract) must be submitted within 45 calendar days from the day after the publication of a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the EU.
Complaint guidelines (in English) can be found at: https://naevneneshus.dk/media/9802/complaint-guidelines.pdf
Præcise oplysninger om fristerne for gennemgangsprocedurer
Actions regarding the procedure (e.g. decisions regarding award of contract) must be submitted within 45 calendar days from the day after the publication of a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the EU.
Complaint guidelines (in English) can be found at: https://naevneneshus.dk/media/9802/complaint-guidelines.pdf
Oplysninger om elektroniske arbejdsgange
Elektronisk fakturering vil blive accepteret
Kilde: OJS 2023/S 228-719588 (2023-11-23)